I'm feeling a bit confused having just read this bbc news story. To be honest the story itself doesn't really interest me, I'm old school and still buy all my music and films on discs. No, what grabbed me was the idea that if they wanted to, the internet providers could block certain sites.
If this is the case, could they please explain why they don't block dangerous and/or illegal sites such as those distributing child pornography, inciting racial hatred and encouraging anorexia to think of some examples.
The only explanation is that it's all down to the £££, but that makes me want to tear my hair out.
No comments:
Post a Comment